Court & Judge
Delhi High Court
Justice Prateek Jalan
Key Legal Principle
👉 Alleged intoxication of a pillion rider does not constitute contributory negligence unless a clear causal connection between the intoxication and the accident is established.
Brief Facts
-
The claimant was a pillion rider on a motorcycle involved in an accident.
-
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) awarded compensation but reduced it by 10% on the ground of contributory negligence.
-
The reduction was based solely on a Medico-Legal Certificate (MLC) stating that the claimant was under the influence of alcohol.
-
The insurance company challenged the compensation before the High Court.
Issues Before The Court
-
Whether alleged intoxication of a pillion rider can justify a finding of contributory negligence.
-
Whether contributory negligence can be inferred without establishing a causal link to the accident.
Court’s Observations & Findings
1. Pillion Rider Is Not The Driver
-
The claimant was not driving the motorcycle.
-
Any allegation of intoxication cannot automatically impact liability unless it affected the occurrence of the accident.
2. No Causal Link Established
-
The MLC merely noted “influence of alcohol”.
-
No blood alcohol content (BAC) test was conducted.
-
No evidence showed that the claimant’s alleged intoxication contributed to the accident.
“No causal link between the alleged contributory negligence and the accident has been established.”
3. Violation Of Law ≠ Contributory Negligence
-
Reliance placed on Mohd. Siddique v. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (2020).
-
Even if a victim violates the law, contributory negligence arises only if the accident could have been avoided but for such violation.
4. MACT’s Deduction Held Unsustainable
-
The Tribunal erred in reducing compensation without legal justification.
-
Mere suspicion or allegation cannot replace proof.
Final Decision
✅ Appeal partly allowed
✅ 10% deduction towards contributory negligence set aside
✅ Compensation enhanced in favour of the claimant
Case Details
-
Case Title: The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Haazari Singh Rawat & Ors.
-
Case No.: MAC.APP. 337/2018
Legal Significance
✔ Reinforces the causal link test for contributory negligence
✔ Protects pillion riders and passengers from arbitrary deductions
✔ Clarifies that intoxication alone is not determinative
✔ Aligns MACT jurisprudence with Supreme Court precedent
